1. The commentary focuses on the exploitation of women's sexuality on television and how hypocritical people are about where and when the exploitation takes place.
2. Yes, the author does give an interesting introduction into the issue because the author paints a clear picture about what was going on and gives clear insight into the situation at hand. He tells us exactly what the article is going to be about by giving the Janet Jackson example and then going more in depth.
3. The author gives really good examples about what is going on in society at that point but does not go to in depth about the current issue and the commentary is written in a more humorous context then a serious one. It is clearly directed at society as a whole to show everyone what is becoming more acceptable, but it is seems as if it is written more for a younger crowd.
4. The possible causes of the trend the author is exploring is that sex sells. It is also that we are living in a constantly evolving world that is much more open to sexuality and not so shy about the topic.
5. The author does not go into detail about anything in his or her own life that could have been the possible causes of this trend. However, he does give example of others reactions to the issue that could possibly be the cause of the trend.
6. The author's stance on this topic is that they are more liberal then conservative and think that people are overreacting to the situation.
7. The significance that the author sees in this trend is that it is going to continue to happen because sex sells and broadcasting companies are going to continue to do whatever they need to in order to promote their network and get viewers.
No comments:
Post a Comment